Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| wiki:tools:laserfilter [2026/02/21 17:36] – Added Wayback Machine permalinks for the PDF references, fixed some spelling mistakes, and deleted some conflicting info about the filters ddq | wiki:tools:laserfilter [2026/02/28 18:51] (current) – Updated filter spec ddq | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Laser Filtration System ====== | ====== Laser Filtration System ====== | ||
| - | It is well understood that depending on the material being " | + | It is well understood that depending on the material being " |
| Many commercial systems exist in order to address these concerns, and in general follow the same design principles: | Many commercial systems exist in order to address these concerns, and in general follow the same design principles: | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| ===== Filter Setup ===== | ===== Filter Setup ===== | ||
| - | In most cases, a prefilter, bagfilter, HEPA filter is the preferred option. This provides the longest lasting filter media for this application of the systems reviewed. However VHS has a modular setup that is arranged | + | The VHS laser filter |
| - | - 2x reusable/washable plastic prefilters to capture large particles entrained in the flow from the laser | + | - Bottom plenum (i.e., empty space); coarse particulates get deposited here |
| - | - 4x Filtrete 1900 MPR 1900 " | + | - MERV 6 / MPR300 Pre-filter (x3 layers) |
| - | - 6x trays of 1" Jacobi Ecosorb GXB granular activated carbon | + | - MERV8 / MPR 600 Furnace |
| + | - MERV11 / MPR 1000 Furnace filters | ||
| + | - MERV13 / MPR 1900 Furnace filters (one 2" layer or two 1" | ||
| + | - Jacobi Ecosorb GXB or equivalent | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| This system is designed to: a) reduce particulate entrapment in the fine particulate phase, b) ensure removal of particulate matter which is roughly similar to tobacco smoke as per literature on laser exhaust, and c) have sufficient residence time of the air in the carbon bed, while not increasing the overall dP of the filter system. | This system is designed to: a) reduce particulate entrapment in the fine particulate phase, b) ensure removal of particulate matter which is roughly similar to tobacco smoke as per literature on laser exhaust, and c) have sufficient residence time of the air in the carbon bed, while not increasing the overall dP of the filter system. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 51: | ||
| While there are no specific change intervals, once a filter becomes clogged with debris it should be replaced. Current experience is that the filter media shouldn’t need to be replaced any more frequently than once every 3-6 months, but this will be highly dependent on usage. | While there are no specific change intervals, once a filter becomes clogged with debris it should be replaced. Current experience is that the filter media shouldn’t need to be replaced any more frequently than once every 3-6 months, but this will be highly dependent on usage. | ||
| In each set of filters, it is recommended to replace the lower filter first, and add the new filter to the top of the stack. | In each set of filters, it is recommended to replace the lower filter first, and add the new filter to the top of the stack. | ||
| - | Repeat for each bank of MERV 8, 10 & 13 filters. | + | Repeat for each bank of MERV 8, 11 & 13 filters. |
| Activated carbon trays (top three) are not a part of this basic maintenance procedure and can be left alone. | Activated carbon trays (top three) are not a part of this basic maintenance procedure and can be left alone. | ||